The Subversive Art of Logic
Logic is not merely another subject in the curriculum; it is the foundation upon which all true education rests, the means by which the mind is trained not merely to absorb information but to think.
It would be easy to dismiss logic as some quaint relic of the academy, an indulgence for philosophers long detached from the concerns of modern education. And yet, if we survey the intellectual landscape today, strewn as it is with fallacies masquerading as arguments, opinions parading as knowledge, and rhetoric unmoored from reason, we might consider whether the absence of logical formation in students is not merely a gap in their curriculum but a fundamental failing of their intellectual development.
The high school freshman, newly inducted into the so-called life of the mind, does not need another buffet of disconnected subjects but, rather, an initiation into the discipline that makes all others possible: logic.
It may strike some as unnecessary, even excessive, to suggest that the study of logic should precede, or at least accompany, a ninth grader’s education in literature, mathematics, language, composition, and rhetoric. But let us consider the Ninth Grader himself: newly arrived at the threshold of high school, a mind teeming with half-formed impressions, dubious certainties, and an overwhelming susceptibility to the illogic of the world around him. He is about to embark upon courses that demand precision of thought, coherence of expression, and the ability to discern truth from falsehood. How, then, shall he proceed without the foundation that logic provides?
Logic & Language
Take language, for instance—not merely as an instrument of communication but as a structured system governed by rules, relations, and necessary inferences. The study of Latin or Greek (or even the rigorous study of English) is not a matter of brute memorization but of understanding how elements relate: how clauses function, how cases determine meaning, how moods alter the force of a statement. A student untutored in logic will flounder through this, mistaking grammatical necessity for arbitrary convention, unable to see that every well-formed sentence is, in its own way, a proof.
Logic & Mathematics
Or consider mathematics, which, though ostensibly a domain of reason, is often reduced in practice to a series of rote procedures. Without logic, a student may learn to perform calculations but will struggle to understand why they hold. He will move blindly through geometry, unaware that each theorem is not an isolated fact but a step in a deductive sequence. Logic, however, teaches that mathematics is not about answers but about reasoning, not about numbers in isolation but about relations governed by necessary inference. The Pythagorean theorem is not merely a formula to memorize but an inevitability that follows from first principles. To learn mathematics without logic is to see only the surface of a deep and structured reality.
Logic & Composition
And then there is composition—the art of arranging thought in written form. A student untrained in logic will write as though assembling a collage, placing sentences in proximity without true coherence, mistaking assertion for argument. But the student trained in logic understands that writing is not the accumulation of statements but the construction of meaning, that every argument must have a structure, that every claim demands evidence, and that conclusions are earned, not merely declared. A well-formed essay, like a well-formed syllogism, does not simply state but demonstrates.
Logic & Literary Analysis
Literary analysis, too, is an exercise in logic, though it is rarely presented as such. Every novel, every poem, every drama is an argument in disguise, a structured presentation of meaning that requires careful inference, attention to premises, and recognition of unstated assumptions. What is irony but a logical tension between expectation and reality? What is tragedy but the working-out of consequences from an initial premise? The student trained in logic will read with new clarity, seeing not only what a text states but what it implies, recognizing the intricate network of reasoning that underlies even the most lyrical of narratives.
Logic & Rhetoric
And, finally, there is rhetoric—the art of persuasion, which, without logic, degenerates into mere manipulation. The student who has learned logic will recognize fallacies not merely as errors but as attempts to obscure truth, will understand that persuasion is not a matter of force but of coherence, and will see that true argumentation is not a game but a discipline. He will enter the public square, whether in speech or in writing, equipped not merely with opinions but with the ability to defend them, not merely with ideas but with the tools to refine and test them.
Thus, if one were to advocate for a single change in the structure of education, let it be this: that every ninth grader, before he is set loose in the wilderness of disconnected subjects, be given the map and compass that logic provides. For logic is not merely another subject in the curriculum; it is the foundation upon which all true education rests, the means by which the mind is trained not merely to absorb information but to think. And if we fail to provide it, we should not be surprised when students graduate not as thinkers but as repositories of unexamined impressions, adrift in a world that demands far more than that.
Michael S. Rose, a leader in the classical education movement, is author of The Art of Being Human (Angelico), Ugly As Sin and other books. His articles have appeared in dozens of publications including The Wall Street Journal, Epoch Times, New York Newsday, National Review, and The Dallas Morning News.
Mr. Rose has it correct when he says, “For logic is not merely another subject in the curriculum; it is the foundation upon which all true education rests,..” In fact, logic is not a subject in the curriculum at all. Why does my dog come up to me and infallibly lick my hand? Because that is where the treat comes from. Why do we put a coat on, before we go outside on a cold day? Because we know that a coat helps hold body heat. These are things learned through logic. But it is not logic that is learned, it is relationships, hand-treat and cold-coat that is learned. Every organism that learns has logic. It is the inventory of learned concepts that develops or grows through exposure to the environment with which one comes in contact, not logic In schools, much of the students’ experience is controlled by a teacher especially in the learning of academic concepts or content.
Every thing is a concept, and concepts are everything. Every concept has attributes that belong solely to that concept by which it is defined. The task of teaching (education) is to describe concepts to students by communicating their unique, immutable attributes. Concepts that have identical attributes are the same thing. But if the teacher attributes to a concept a characteristic that does not belong to it, the student may become confused. Their logic has been given the wrong information. That is why they did not learn. Logic is never wrong. Not learning is never, NEVER, the student’s fault. It is always the teaching that is at fault. Even if the correct information was “presented” to the student, but the student did not “get” it, the student is working without the full set of peculiarities for that concept. It should be that that is also the fault of the instruction/instructor. In general, education does not live by this rule. It should be allowed to blame the student, because that provides educators with the perfect cop out.